Q: The chart below shows the proportion of different types of vehicles that use a major bridge road in the UK in 1965, 1985 and 2005.
The charts highlight the percentages of various types of vehicles that used a major bridge road in the UK in the years 1965, 1985 and 2005.
According to the given illustration, in 1965, recreation motors made up a large fraction of the total vehicle use at 48%. In 40 years between 1965 and 2005 the percentage of recreational motors that used a bridge road in the UK increased. Recreational motors rose from 48% to 56% in 1985 and 63% in 2005.
On the contrary, moving to a more detailed analysis, public transport accounts for 30% of the total uses of a bridge road that declined close to half (14%) in 1985. However, only 7 % of cars were used bridge road in 2005. Ten percentage of cars were used in 1965 that stayed at 10% in both 1985 and 2005. Twelve percentages of commercial lorries were used to bridge roads in 1965. Moreover, it increased from 14% to 20 % in 1985 and 2005.
To conclude, Recreational motors were the most useable vehicles all the time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-02 | sabbir2020 | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show the most common advantages and disadvantages of Bowen Island, according to a survey of visitors. 61
- The pie charts show the level of satisfaction of university students with some of the facilities provided in the universities of the UK 49
- Q: The chart below shows the proportion of different types of vehicles that use a major bridge road in the UK in 1965, 1985 and 2005. 73
- Two pie charts The pie charts below show the most common advantages and disadvantages of Bowen Island according to a survey of visitors 79
- The pie charts below show the expenditure of university students of three countries in 2002 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6091954023 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61076917832 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511494252874 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0713558335 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.434251521774 0.215688989381 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197555686858 0.103423049105 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14412638477 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291614966484 0.15604864568 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.192045693325 0.0819641961636 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.