The pie charts below show the expenditure of university students of three countries in 2002.
The pie charts illustrate the expenses of university students in three different countries in 2000.
Overall, 1/3 of the living expenses are accommodation in every mentioned country where students spend a very little amount of money on other purposes.
According to the more given illustration, the accommodation makes up a large fraction of total expenditure at 40% in country A that declined 10% in country B and 5% in-country C. Students spend 7% of the total buying books in country A. However, book accounts for 20% of total in country B and country C. Students spend about 20% of money on food in both country A and B. Moreover, 30% of money consume on food in country C followed by leisure in countries A, B, and C in descending order.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-02 | sabbir2020 | 79 | view |
- The pie charts below show the expenditure of university students of three countries in 2002 79
- The table below shows personal savings as a percentage of personal income for selected countries in 1970, 1990 and 2000. 73
- The pie charts below show the most common advantages and disadvantages of Bowen Island, according to a survey of visitors. 61
- The pie charts show the level of satisfaction of university students with some of the facilities provided in the universities of the UK 49
- Q: The chart below shows the proportion of different types of vehicles that use a major bridge road in the UK in 1965, 1985 and 2005. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 626.0 965.302439024 65% => OK
No of words: 130.0 196.424390244 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81538461538 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.37664837539 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90794667182 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 181.8 283.868780488 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7665709619 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4285714286 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315998429355 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166567405939 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110617685832 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24277881266 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14260355534 0.0819641961636 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.