Many people believe that bicycle is a healthy and environmentally friendly mode of transport. However, it is still unpopular in many countries. What are the reasons? What could be done to encourage the use of bicycles among the wider population?
Over the years cycling provides various advantaged to health, travel, and transport. It is by far one of the first modes of transport that is slowly loosing its limelight. Nowadays, cycling os considered as a hobby for kids and as a means of exercise for adults. In many countries the number of cyclers have been deteriorating due to the vast availability of other means of transport. This write-up tackles on the reasons of this phenomenon and later provides ways to encourage individuals that cycling id more beneficial.
The first use if bicycles is for travel, many places in the far-flung areas find it the most convenient means to move around. On the other hand, cycling is also known to have health benefits as it allows the cycler to pedal and work his leg muscles as well as improve ones cardiac strength. Moreover, cycling does not need any engine or fuel to make it work, which causes no pollution, thereby it is environment friendly.
However, as years passed inventions on transport vehicle grew, due to this the use of bicycles were replaced by automobiles and buses. These new modes offer a more efficient and comfortable travel experience, which bicycle cannot provide. Furthermore, bicycles rely on human strength, so in a way it makes commuting slow and connotes a long travel time. Lastly, people of today perceive cycling as a form of a hobby rather than a transport service, this is because of its popularity amongst athletes and sports enthusiasts.
There are three ways of encouraging people back to cycling. Firstly, is through promoting its health benefits, people today are health conscious, hence it is the best time to bring awareness of the good effects bicycles have. Secondly, is to make bicycles available for public use, at the same time removing other modes can force the public to opt for bicycles when moving around the vicinity, this can be applied in the city centers or towns. Finally, providing adverts on the utilization of bicycles especially on short distances, this can be an eye opener to the people that instead of using transportation that are destroying the environment, it is best to opt for an eco-friendly transport.
To sum up, the use if bicycle does not only merit humans health but also the environment. These advantages are often shoved off by the people because of the convenience and comfort of buses, cars and motorcycles bring. The government should take the lead in promoting the use of bicycles among men.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | Emz | 73 | view |
| 2016-08-09 | Daniel2016 | 84 | view |
- Illustrated in the flow chart are the processes of producing energy by the means of hydroelectric power. 11
- Many people believe that bicycle is a healthy and environmentally friendly mode of transport. However, it is still unpopular in many countries. What are the reasons? What could be done to encourage the use of bicycles among the wider population? 73
- The graph below give information about water use worldwide.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 11
- Displayed in the bar graph are the proportions of oil manufactured and utilized by the different global sectors from 1980 and projections towards 2020. 89
- Illustrated in the flow chart are the processes of producing energy by the means of hydroelectric power. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2072.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 416.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98076923077 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77069939689 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550480769231 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1359206323 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.052631579 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8947368421 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.47368421053 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238612879206 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717835935228 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495603811838 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129943183874 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468301755197 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.