how does professor gives evidences that the work is Rembrandt's
The article states that one of the paintings attributed to famous Dutch painter –Rembrandt, is originally not his work. The author argues that the elements of the paintings are not consonant with the famous painter’s style and provides three reasons to support the claim. However, the professor disagrees with the author’s claim and provides further description to prove why the work is correctly attributed to Rembrandt.
Firstly, the author explains about the inconsistency in the painting. Rembrandt is generally renowned for depicting his subjects with a flair touch of detail in his painting. However, the woman in the painting wears a white cap, peculiar to a servant; meanwhile, on the other hand the woman also wears luxurious fur collar that no servant could afford. This difference in inconsistency regarding the subject couldn’t be his work. Professor clarifies this discrepancy by arguing that the fur collar was added later, probably 100 years after the original painting was made, in order to increase the resale value of the painting.
Secondly, the author posits that there is no element of shadow and light in the painting, which has always been a peculiar feature of his painting. The professor claims that the painting originally had light -colored cloth which added to the illumination of the face, giving a strong impression of the shadow effect. However, addition of fur color moderated the effect.
Finally, the author implies that Rembrandt used a single whole wooden background for the painting. Woods glued together in the background made the author to believe a conjecture that the painting couldn’t have been his original work. Professor provides another evidence to reject the author’s putative thought. Professor claims that when fur collar was added, simultaneously, the wooden panel in the background was also enlarged to give a monolithic and attractive look to the paintings. Such additions were made to increase the value of the painting prior to its sale. In this way, providing enough evidences, the professor implies that the painting is originally Rembrandt’s work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-07 | sabindawadi | 85 | view |
- it is important to keep your old friends than make new friends 70
- Laws should not be stationary and fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 66
- How childrens are socialized today determines the destiny of society. Unfortunately, we have not yet learned how to raise children who can help about a better society. 50
- To be effective leader , a public official must maintain highest ethical and moral standards 83
- how does professor gives evidences that the work is Rembrandt's 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1373.03311258 133% => OK
No of words: 334.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45209580838 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9544451426 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 419.366225166 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1455707631 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.117647059 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6470588235 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166402565055 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600309350916 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581529435246 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1055561473 0.162205337803 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526663682942 0.0443174109184 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.