after replacing late-night weather and local news show with national issues, there was effusive of viewers complaints also the advertisers withdrew their investment.
The given notion has vague points to support the claim to restore the time devotion to weather and local news. There is lack of evidence that exactly the broadcast of national news is the main reason to loose viewers or lossing the advertisement money. The notion informs about only the late-night program on national news but it does not clarify the prior situation, when the weather and local news was boradcast.
The given passage does not clarify what the complaints are. The complaints are not explicitly against the broadcast of weather and local news or against the choosing of timing for such news. The complaint questions the concern of the television channel about their intetion to cover the weather and local news.
The television channel could broadcast the weather and local news at any other time rather than late-night which is likely to benefit the people. But there is no evidence that people want the weather and local news during late-night. So, the idea of the late-night news program on national news cannot be blamed. The complaint is about the overall lack of coverage of weather and local news.
Again, the notion does not clarify about the reasons why the local businesses stopped their adverstisement during the late-night program. There could be a number of reasons for taking such step. But there is no given evidence that broadcasting of national news is responsible to loose the advertisement revenue.
The logic behind the decision of restoring the time of weather and local news is very weak. It is quite understandable that telecasting the weather and local news any other time will be equally beneficial to all people unless there is no exact reason mentioned to broadcast it at late-night. Late-night telecasting of national news or increased devotion towards national news cannot be blamed therefore. Also, restoring the time devotion for weather and local news to their former level does not gurantee the satisfaction of the viewers or re engaging the local businesses for advertisements.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-07 | Taoseef_Ishtiak | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... of national news is the main reason to loose viewers or lossing the advertisement mo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...es not clarify what the complaints are. The complaints are not explicitly against t...
^^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t the choosing of timing for such news. The complaint questions the concern of the ...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... cover the weather and local news. The television channel could broadcast the ...
^^^
Line 13, column 280, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...ting of national news is responsible to loose the advertisement revenue. The lo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 28.8173652695 35% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 55.5748502994 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 2260.96107784 76% => OK
No of words: 333.0 441.139720559 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14714714715 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68860520853 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 204.123752495 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.399399399399 0.468620217663 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 705.55239521 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1511848774 57.8364921388 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.823529412 119.503703932 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5882352941 23.324526521 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.64705882353 5.70786347227 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367848703693 0.218282227539 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149807648142 0.0743258471296 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605872570572 0.0701772020484 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245593429349 0.128457276422 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538427562466 0.0628817314937 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.3799401198 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.32208582834 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 98.500998004 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.