These days some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events Do you think this is a positive or negative development

Past few decades have witnessed an upside trend in the number of people spending a lot of money to go to sporting or cultural events, which can be considered as a positive development for a wide variety of reasons, including health and economic boost.
There are those believing that a large number of people resort to sport events ever than before. What experts opine is that sport events as the therapeutic activities can boost individuals’ mood and help them get rid of the stress. They place particular emphasis on encouraging people to take part in sport events. Furthermore, attendance of people in sport events would play significant role to draw much more capable individuals towards playing sports. The more the spectators, the more likely you are to be tempted in playing sports, which would greatly enhance joyous among people.
It is also said that if more people participate in cultural events, economy will be boomed, as it would help tourism industry development. Having hold cultural events, the governments ought to take practical approaches and develop infrastructures providing facilities. Moreover, if more people decide to spend their money on cultural events, the custom of a specific area would be kept for the next generations as a cultural inherit, which would help identity and beliefs of a country. Tourists tend to think of culture first and beauties second in their destinations, and cultural events as basic elements can stream money into locals income.
Overall, it seems that stronger development is in favour of spending a lot of money on sporting and cultural events, which would bring about positive features in people’s lives including economically or healthy.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 32, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... boost. There are those believing that a large number of people resort to sport events ever than...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24087591241 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88265725058 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576642335766 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0553412743 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.545454545 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309000533575 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11973673953 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079717922674 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214339807393 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657848406154 0.056905535591 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.