The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
The bar chart illustrates the daily physical activities performed in 2010 by the Australian men and women in alternate age groups in percentage. The age groups varies from 15 to over 65.
Firstly taking the age group from 15 to 24 in which male performed 52.8% and female did 47.7 %. Males and Females in age groups between 25 to 34 saw a drastic decrease for male performing physical activities which is 42.2%, but female group increased to almost 49%. Next age group from 35 to 44 resulted decrease in performance of male to 39.5%. Though male percentages reduced, female physical activity kept increasing and reached 52.5%. The female age groups between 45 to 64 kept the percentages in equal level almost reaching 53.3%. But the male group between 45 to 64 slightly increased their physical activites by increasing the percentage upto 45.1%. The older male and female groups almost did equal physical activities which is 46.7% and 47.1% respectively.
Overall from the chart it is evident that female age groups between 35 to 64 did the maximum number of physical activities than the male group excluding ages between 15 to 24.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-10 | bassmodulators123 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | Wardiati Yusuf | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ical activities performed in 2010 by the Australian men and women in alternate ag...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96335078534 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61553767444 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492146596859 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.282184257 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312477968292 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159919878094 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10705015804 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276654743156 0.15604864568 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959432425255 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.