For many years it was a controversial debate on how the government should spend budget. Some people including me believe that more money should spend to develop public transportation infrastructures, while others think it is necessary for government to spend budget in different aspects like reducing expenditure as well as environment protection.
To first group's minds, it is vital to reach a developed infrastructure in transportation system, which has been called sustaainable develpoment by United Nations, in order to prevent environmental problems including air pollution, energy overconsumption, and so forth. for example, in my city, there is no citywide subway network, thus people are forced to use their own car either take a taxi to go around the city; which leads to exacerbating air pollution especially in cold weather. In addition, public transportaion can reduce government costs indirectly; for example in countries like Iran, government are responsible to make tariffs for petrol and present it in lower price in gas stations. Whereas developing public transportation like rapid bus transition systems and subway networks, reduce the amount of petrol, it can leads to cost reduction, therefore.
On the other hand, others may argue that spending more money in environment conservation section as well as cost reduction should be priorities for government because even in developed cities with an appropriate public transportation, around the world, there are authorities facing with numerous problem such as environmental problems and budget deficiency. However, I think these problems are just results of unsustainable developments and it is important to address the roots of the problem.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that government should take steps toward developing every infarstructure like public transportation in order to prevant later environmental problems as well as abundant expenditures.
- some people say that government should spend money on faster public transport. others think that money should be spend on different aspects such as cost reduction and environment conservation. discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- some people say that government should spend money on faster public transport. others think that money should be spend on different aspects such as cost reduction and environment conservation. discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
..., energy overconsumption, and so forth. for example, in my city, there is no citywi...
^^^
Line 3, column 831, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...ks, reduce the amount of petrol, it can leads to cost reduction, therefore. On the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69655172414 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38286934333 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606896551724 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.5311269799 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 183.555555556 106.682146367 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2222222222 20.7667163134 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.3333333333 7.06120827912 245% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296216590408 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120525687499 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113108081737 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191555322695 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109117670108 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.5 13.0946893788 164% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.08 50.2224549098 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.