Television has had a significant influence on the culture of many societies. To what extent would you say that television has positively or negatively affected the cultural development of your society?
It is unarguable that television has had a considerable impact and changed the world in which we live. However, there is debate whether that change has been for the better or the worse, when we consider cultural development. While there are certainly strong feelings on both sides of the argument in western Europe, my own view is that television has had a largely positive influence on our society.
There are, however, several reasons why it can be argued that television has a negative effect on cultural development. Perhaps the principle argument is the lowbrow nature of many programmes, part...
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-07-06 | Mohammadsadegh | 56 | view |
2015-04-06 | Jeyhun | 80 | view |
2015-03-25 | hinagh2 | 57 | view |
2014-09-26 | Amandeep97 | 70 | view |
2014-08-03 | eddysuaib | 80 | view |
- News editor decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspaper. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad News? Would it better if more good news was reported.(Re-write) -Syerapke- 67
- Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 80
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. (RE-WRITE 1) 70
- The diagram opposite shows how a thermos flask works Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 58
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australiaand France in 1980 and 2000. (Part 2) 80
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 309 350
No. of Characters: 1533 1500
No. of Different Words: 158 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.193 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.961 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.773 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 110 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 89 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 61 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.312 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.021 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.361 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.55 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.155 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5