The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
The pie charts illustrate the amount of water, as a percentage, used for agriculture, domestic and industrial services in six different continents.
Overall, the majority of continents used highest amount of water on agriculture, whilst water for domestic services was marginally used in all 6 continents. North America and Europe spends much of its water for industrial purposes.
It is noticeable, South America, Africa, Asia and South East Asia use water for agriculture significantly with 71%, 84%, 88%, and 81% respectively. On the other hand, Europe and North America spends large volumes of water for industrial purposes, at 53% and 48% respectively. Water for domestic use was insignificant in all countries.
Similarly, Africa and Central Asia used equal amounts of water for industrial and domestic services, at 7% each. The variance in water used for industrial services is lower in South America, Africa, Central Asia and South East Asia, as it is slightly similar. Likewise, North America and Europe has a small difference in water used for agriculture, at 39% and 32% respectively.
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 67
- Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? 84
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summa 73
- People eat more and more processed food than they did in the past.Why is this?What are the effects of this ? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, similarly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42196531792 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05206691158 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491329479769 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5067894143 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.222222222 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270274278242 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151665258807 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06289872692 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214206275813 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459775990677 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.