Some people feel that public money should not be spent on cultural amenities such as museums, theatres and art festivals. How important do you think these things are to society as a whole? Are there any areas which are more important for the government to fund?
Despite the fact that the arts account for a tiny proportion of state expenditure, state support for them is a highly contentious issue. However, the importance of cultural amenities has been appreciated by a large number of members of society because they represent cultural identity of a nation to some extent, but regarding this as the main priority to invest a significant amount of money may be a rather simplistic view since there are many other major issues should be dealt with.
Admittedly, it is correct that some government funds should spend on preserving and developing cultural amenities. This is because the arts are the main part of every nation's culture treated with great respect and considered to be sacred by almost all citizens. Therefore, without coordinated measures from the state and the public in an attempt to preserve cultural infrastructures and activities such as museums and cinema, national identity will continue to be forgotten, leading to a loss of cultural uniqueness. Furthermore, art festivals and theaters, for example, have an important impact on our quality of life, by which I mean they provide entertainment to the public and thus receiving great pleasure in taking part in such magnificent performances.
Foremost among these other areas appears to be the question of public services, by which I mean the development of a country is more likely to be connected with the investment of a lot of funds in public transportation, hospitals, and education. If this is not addressed, people potentially face the collapse of economic, social and educational structures, consequently leading to the collapse of the country as a whole. Therefore, a large amount of government budget should spend on crises such as infrastructures, poverty, and crime, encountering not only all underdeveloped countries but also many wealthy countries.
To conclude, it appears that sending public money on maintaining cultural amenities can be useful, as long as other challenging issues considered being as main priorities to be addressed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | angellica | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | ahmadrava88 | 78 | view |
- The table below shows the consumer durables (telephone, refrigerator, etc.) owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983. 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of 100,000 people asking if they travelled abroad and why they travelled for the period 1994-98. 56
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 84
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tones, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007. 73
- The table shows the number of foreign visitors (in millions) to 7 countries. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...tural amenities has been appreciated by a large number of members of society because they represe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing as main priorities to be addressed.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, for example, i mean, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34049079755 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15496277813 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564417177914 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.3027148765 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.1 106.682146367 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6 20.7667163134 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295316865542 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104801675425 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425133152297 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169028964111 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216828697148 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.