The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present.
Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The map shows the changes brought in a seaside village from the year 1985 until the present day.
Overall, the village has experienced major changes in sport facilities and housing as well as fishing facilities have also been introduced.
One change that stands out is that the forest near the road has been destroyed in order to expand the farmland. Gold and tennis facilities have been provided in the re-developed farmland. To the west of the village, some housing facilities have been built along with a road to connect them.
On the west side of the village, in the south, shops have been converted into restaurants as well as the fish market next to it is now changed into apartments. A fishing port has been established to the south of the apartments over the sea. Lastly, a new car parking area can also be seen next to the hotel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | Sagar Gurung | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Sagar Gurung | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Sagar Gurung | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Sagar Gurung | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Sagar Gurung | 11 | view |
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Most people agree that money cannot bring happiness. Why is happiness difficult to define? How can people achieve happiness? 61
- Some people think that government should give money to creative people such as artists and musicians. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present.Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 11
- The table below shows the cinema viewing figures for films by country, in millions.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, lastly, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 701.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70469798658 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50291483604 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577181208054 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0541178543 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.625 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0609262515484 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320383996353 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061532225945 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0585490115057 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767842282434 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.