Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made reading passage. bird populations decreasing
The reading and lecture are both about bird populations decreasing, which is a significant topic in the United States. The author of the reading believes that there are some reasons that cause bird populations are declined in this region. The lecture challenges the statement made by the author. The professor is of the opinion that these reasons are inconceivable.
First of all, the author suggests that human populations can destroy bird habitats because people change forests and grasslands to homes and offices. This argument is challenged by the lecture. She says that city development provides more spaces for other types of bird populations, also people now complain about increased birds. Furthermore, he mentions that can now be found birds like falcons in cities, consequently, some populations may reduce, but others will spread.
Secondly, the writer contends that agriculture systems can ruin bird habitats. The article notes the most wilderness areas are altered to agriculture use. The lecture, however, rebuts this by asserting that the United States used less and less land for agricultural every year. She elaborates on this by mentioning that the production of new crops cause there is no need for new lands because these crops can produce a lot of foods.
Finally, it is stated in the article that chemical pesticides are dangerous for birds. The author establishes that pesticides kill garden pests and can get into the food chain; therefore, birds eat poisoned pests. So, this event can stop them from reproducing. The lecture, on the other hand, posits that this idea is true but for traditional pesticides. She explains that new pesticides have been designed with much less toxic. Moreover, she mentions that there is a new method to develop pest-resistant crops, so this work causes there is no need for pesticides and birds can swell pesticides without any harmfully.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | NIMA SAEEDI | 85 | view |
- Which one do you think is important to long – lasting friendship?1.Help you when you need 2.Share same interest and hobby3.Trust 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?It is better for the younger people to ask the risk and explore new things than the older people. 83
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage 78
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to 73
- You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you do not like, should you still be friends with him or her? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...opulations are declined in this region. The lecture challenges the statement made b...
^^^
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...enges the statement made by the author. The professor is of the opinion that these ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24262295082 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73974793702 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570491803279 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0636838725 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8333333333 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9444444444 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129274292986 0.272083759551 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474590054764 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049122586931 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879896220153 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592629969762 0.0443174109184 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.