The disadvantages of reducing work hours
Researchers and economists have been debating whether the option of four-day workweek is beneficial for both individuals and companies or not. According to the lecturer, the debate on this issue is threefold.
First, the professor completely disagrees with the benefits of reducing workforce in terms of companies' costs reduction. Hiring and developing new human resources as well as increased medical and insurance costs will definitely reduce firms' income. Moreover, the more employees are hired the more space they need, so the companies may need to rent more offices; therefore this will add to the firms' problems.
Second, the lecturer believes that work efficiency rate and reduction of workforce are completely unrelated inasmuch as companies will require their employees to work more than the regulars hours they are supposed to. Moreover, senior management, of course, increases it's expectation insomuch as the employees only work for four days per week. This situation will lead to job dissatisfaction and unpleasantness.
Third, The reading says that by reducing work hours, people will have more pastime to enjoy with their families; however, the teacher does not concede with this idea since the part-time employees are always being afraid of losing their jobs. Although they will have enough time for their hobbies, they are at the first line of getting fired by their managers, also senior managers are not eager to promote these employees because they need people who are more eager to work full-time for the company.
All in all, reducing work hours is not beneficial, especially for individuals insomuch as the reduction of their job instability. Furthermore, they lose the chance of promotion as managers always tend to have full-time employees who devote themselves completely to their organizations. Finally, companies do not want extra expenses of medical insurances on people who are not eager to work full-time for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-08 | zeze | 76 | view |
| 2020-04-15 | Elhamsarvari | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | heshan007 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-04 | farshad_hom | 83 | view |
- TPO Extra 2 integrated smarts cars are faster safer and cheaper 80
- TPO 16 independent the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide 73
- TPO 08 agree or disagree television advertising directed towards young children age two to five should not be allowed 90
- TPO 38 integrated using international fund to protect forests from being deforested is useful 80
- agnostids behaviors 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, well, of course, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44262295082 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79496225887 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544262295082 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7753801131 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.692307692 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169726727303 0.272083759551 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658877318376 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074001709856 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957363066073 0.162205337803 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623576522284 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.