。
In the society of the digital age, people can say or display whatever they like without considering the impacts that it would have on other people. There is little doubt that some people would say things on the internet that they would never say it or display illegal materials that they would never show others in their real life.
Firstly, since people can have an anonymous account, some people would take it as a barrier; they tend to rent their anger towards others. Negative comments are evidence of this kind of action, and it is typically happening to famous people. Looking at the comments under any picture posted by famous people and you would see rude, nasty, and harsh comments; criticising their outfit, appearance, or even the way they stand. Consequently, it will result in cyberbully, and this would then create severe mental issues on others, such as suffering depression.
On the other hand, a considerable proportion of deaths in the 21st-century are caused by suicide, and cyberbully is one of the factors that leads someone to become suicidal. A great example of this is, in 2019, a Korean female actress, at the age of 25, has ended her life in her department. As her death news came out, every netizens believed that cyberbully killed her. When she posts any picture, people would come and comment to her as a vamp, undignified, and ill-manner. It is believed that negative comments lead the actress to suffer depression, and finally, it has become a rope that hangs the actress in her department.
In conclusion, people should not say whatever they like irrespective of the impacts it would result in. However, with the support of the digital age, there are a significant proportion of people who hide behind their anonymous account and post negative comments about others. Consequently, this kind of immoral action is leading to a tragedy.
Comments
Thanks for your post. ------…
Thanks for your post.
--------------------------
Slow rising ice cream squishy toys ice cream squishies
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 221, Rule ID: FEMALE_ACTOR[1]
Message: Did you mean 'actress'?
Suggestion: actress
...t example of this is, in 2019, a Korean female actress, at the age of 25, has ended her life i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, then, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98095238095 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62870945117 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536507936508 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7218585853 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.071428571 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.244688304435 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.084324248473 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151304729494 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.