What is your approach to problem-solving, and how does it work for you? Use specific details to support your answer.
No one can deny that everyone has their own approach for solving problems. I am personally deciding issues by making deep contemplation. It is my firm belief, and I develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, by trying to carefully think about problem you can save time. By making this it will be easy for you to solve problem for your benefit. While we are contemplating about particular issue which we have encountered during the day, our brain stimulates by trying to solve it right. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. You see, when I was fourteen years old my parents left our home locked by hiding key in the corner of the home below the carpet, where no one can found it. In order to find the keys I have to deeply think about it, where my mother used to keep key from our house. As a result, I was able to find it without any efforts in such a short time. For this reason, thinking beyond will advocate you to save your time a lot.
Secondly, by trying to carefully contemplate about problem you can easily identify it is pros and cons. When you will be aware of your problems benefits and drawbacks, we can think critically does this problem will eventually solved or not? We have some problems which are not easy to decide at all, it may for some time become solved, although after quite some period it will appear in front of us as a controversial matter. It is certainly clear to see why by contemplating you can save much of your time and solve it completely.
In light of the above mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that carefully contemplating will help us to succeed in solving problems. As I have included by wasting less time and identifying advantages along with it is disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | AdiAlarcon22 | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | AdiAlarcon22 | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | AdiAlarcon22 | 60 | view |
- Passage:Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves.Examples of a 80
- Telecommuting (working for a company from home rather than in the office and communicating with the office by computer) is becoming more and more common. Discuss the advantages of telecommuting versus working in an office. Then indicate which you prefer a 61
- What is your approach to problem-solving, and how does it work for you? Use specific details to support your answer. 60
- What is your approach to problem-solving, and how does it work for you? Use specific details to support your answer. 60
- What is your approach to problem-solving, and how does it work for you? Use specific details to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
No one can deny that everyone has their ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rights'?
Suggestion: rights
... brain stimulates by trying to solve it right. I have to admit that my opinion on thi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: been
...dmit that my opinion on this matter has been been profoundly influenced by my own persona...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'solve'
Suggestion: solve
...cally does this problem will eventually solved or not? We have some problems which are...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 326.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58588957055 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65223210285 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536809815951 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6495268531 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9411764706 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11764705882 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168189038013 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601461146026 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728450772037 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0892552513444 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686262463463 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.