When you give money to charitable organizations, do you prefer to choose how the donation will be used or leave the decision to the organization?
There are always some people who think helping others is their duty; therefore, they help people either directly or indirectly. Some people think it is a more reasonable idea that we help people by giving our donation to charitable organizations. The question is whether we should choose how the donation will be used or not. In my point of view,Something which is more logical is to let charitable organization choose how our donation should be used. There are some reasons supporting my idea, two of which will be explained.
To begin with, someone who works in a charitable organization knows better how the donation should be used. In other words, they have had experiences in helping different people in various situations; hence, they will be able to recognize who needs the donation more. For instance, imagine someone who cares about animals so much, and he wants charitable organizations to spend his money only for dogs, but simultaneously a terrible earthquake happens. Are dogs more important than hungry and homeless people? All told, we had better let charitable organization decide how the donation will be used because they spend our donation for more urgent circumstances.
Secondly, if we let them make decision about our donations, they will work more efficiently because they feel we truth them. I had worked in a national charity. One day a person came to our office and wanted us to spend her money only for farmers who were in a bad condition. One of our colleagues was angry about that. He told that if she knows how her money must be spent, why does she need us? Actually, my colleague was angry because he thought she does not trust us. Thus, if you want charitable organization to do their best so let them choose how you donation should be used.
To wrap it up, it would be more beneficial and logical if you let charities choose how your donations will be used to help people. In this way, your donation will be used for the most urgent situations and the organization will do their best because they feel that you trust them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-27 | elham zohrehvand | 53 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There are always some people who think helping others is their duty; ...
^^
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Something
...ill be used or not. In my point of view,Something which is more logical is to let charita...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...but simultaneously a terrible earthquake happens. Are dogs more important than hu...
^^
Line 5, column 648, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they spend our donation for more urgent circumstances. Secondly, if we let ...
^^
Line 9, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ently because they feel we truth them. I had worked in a national charity. One da...
^^
Line 13, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eficial and logical if you let charities choose how your donations will be used ...
^^
Line 13, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... choose how your donations will be used to help people. In this way, your donati...
^^
Line 13, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... because they feel that you trust them.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82584269663 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69396374587 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48595505618 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8354649267 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4210526316 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7368421053 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3644275012 0.236089414692 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121885170712 0.076458572812 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115395956936 0.0737576698707 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249249121351 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675077579183 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.