Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Every advanced society knows that scientific research and discoveries usually create a better lifestyle for a society. Scientific research requires well prepared, studied, informed citizens, and these citizens are most likely to make good decisions about their life and their nation, and have better jobs with better payment. Governments should not only have few restrictions on scientific research, but to support it in a better way, spend more money on it and dedicate more time to improve every aspect of it.
Science is the study of everything, and a lot of its branches have a varied number of normal life applications, even the most advanced ones, come to normal use when time passes by. Engineering have led to better technology and tools for our daily activities, such as oil saving vehicles or faster computers, advances in medicine have led to a fight back and control diseases that just a few decades ago were deadly, advances in genetics have allowed us to improve food that is not present in nature in the way we eat it, etc.
Governments and misinformed society members sometimes underrate the advantages that science research brings to our daily life. In example, people sometimes states that we do not need to explore space and research in astrophysics, but if we did not do that, we would not comprehend some phenomena that is present in other planets and in ours, or use these technological advances in our life, such as solar panels and the internet. NASA’s budget is far less than 1% of the U.S. annual budget, and it still makes great advances and discoveries that have good use; imagine what NASA could do if the government spend 1 or 2% of its budget in science? How far could we have come by now?
Even when in some special cases, science research is used for bad purposes, such as weapons creation and disease modifications, the science on its own it is not bad nor good, it is amoral, it becomes a problem whenever we put to bad use that knowledge, instead of trying to improve everyone’s life. And some research ought to be controlled and regulated, but not all of it, and not in a way that would force scientists to abandon good projects.
In any case, science research and development have way more positive contributions to our societies, than it has wrongdoings. Applying a clear control of it but letting it grow, we can expect not only more and better informed citizens, but in consequence, a better lifestyle and a better society to live in.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-20 | pratysinha | 50 | view |
2020-01-19 | jason123 | 75 | view |
2020-01-09 | asdfjmn | 66 | view |
2019-10-04 | muthukrishna | 66 | view |
2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 16 | view |
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 80
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning f 65
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rat 50
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posit 75
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Writ 73
Governments should not only have few restrictions on scientific research, but to support it in a better way
Description: Not only...but also is not used properly. can you re-write this sentence?
Engineering have led to
Engineering has led to
people sometimes states that
people sometimes state that
flaws:
The essay is not exactly right on the topic. Need to argue whether Governments should
put restrictions on scientific research or not.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: ? out of 6
Category: ? Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 428 350
No. of Characters: 1997 1500
No. of Different Words: 208 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.548 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.666 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.64 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 142 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 108 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 72 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 32.923 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.489 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.692 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.37 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.637 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.173 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5