Speaking topics in text
Using the examples of the leafy sea dragon and the cuttlefish, describe two kinds of camouflage and the benefits they provide.
Speaking recording
Votes
This speaking topic by users
| Post dates | Users | rates | Contents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-09 | Elena Cristina | 75.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2019-12-31 | bishoy | 94.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2019-10-17 | Seema Modak | 66.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2018-07-09 | Elena Cristina | 46.50 | Check this speaking |
Speaking category
Speakings by user bishoy
:
- Using the examples of the Venus flytrap and the sundew, describe two ways that carnivorous plants get their nutrients. 66
- TPO-38 Task-3Withdrawal from classes 66
- Using points and examples from the talk, explain the two definitions of money presented by the professor. 68
- TPO 06 - Question 2Some people have one career throughout their lives. Other people do different kinds of work at different points in their lives. Which do you think is better? Explain why. 90
- If you were asked to choose one place in your country where would you take a tourist which one would you choose Why What is especially impressive about the place 75
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 634.0 578.828451883 110% => OK
No of words: 158.0 151.265690377 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.01265822785 3.82278263415 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.50058242952 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.00627919916 1.80425224433 111% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 92.4686192469 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632911392405 0.61298525976 103% => OK
Syllable count: 194.4 182.283891213 107% => OK
Avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.20543933054 100% => OK
Performance on coherence:
Topic speech coherence ratio: 0.0867001907404 0.0839705835288 103% => OK
Acoustic performance on paragraphs:
How many acoustic paragraphs: 2.0 4.47071129707 45% => OK
Average paragraph length: 79.0 65.8948926009 120% => OK
STD paragraph length: 37.0 19.7758100068 187% => OK
Average paragraph duration: 26.97 25.5208953607 106% => OK
STD paragraph duration: 14.24 7.49434385956 190% => OK
Acoustic performance on sentences:
How many acoustic sentences: 32.0 42.9832635983 74% => OK
Average acoustic sentence length: 4.9375 3.78147595546 131% => OK
STD acoustic sentence length: 3.9365078115 2.94285465224 134% => OK
Average acoustic sentences duration: 1.6509375 1.39386743896 118% => OK
STD acoustic sentences duration: 1.03369289254 0.967747756167 107% => OK
Acoustic performance on acoustic silence:(An acoustic silence means a little pause between two or more words)
How many acoustic silence: 32.0 40.4456066946 79% => OK
Total acoustic silence duration: 4.89 7.59280334728 64% => OK
Average acoustic silence duration: 0.1528125 0.19053887516 80% => OK
STD acoustic silence duration: 0.122480467193 0.157467062838 78% => OK
Acoustic performance on acoustic words:
Total word duration: 46.04 46.3453556485 99% => OK
Average word duration: 0.291392405063 0.308780311121 94% => OK
STD word duration: 0.153406337047 0.201157623399 76% => OK
Disfluencies: like hesitations, or 'ehn' or taking a long time to pronounce a word:
How many disfluencies: 6.0 8.09623430962 74% => OK
Total_disfluencies_duration: 4.11 6.56692468619 63% => OK
Total acoustic noise duration: 1.09 3.53066945607 31% => OK
Acoustic rates:
Total speech duration: 53.94 59.5455230126 91% => Talk more. Do not save time. People can talk 4-5 words in one second.
Compare to expected duration: 0.899 0.992425383543 91% => Some seconds left. Need to talk more.
Rate of silence: 0.593251761216 0.681803438845 87% => OK
Rate of speech: 2.929180571 2.53813033465 115% => OK
Rate of speech by unique words: 1.8539117538 1.55221717717 119% => OK
Rate of word duration by unique words: 2.17202432667 1.99939622689 109% => OK
Average articulation rates: 0.432774094937 0.309613076454 140% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by speech e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the speech e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas.