Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific solutions presented reading passage. why prevent declining trees?
The reading and lecture are both about Torreya tree, which started to die out. The author of reading believes that can prevent diminishing Torreya in some ways. The lecture challenges the methods made by the author. The Professor is of the opinion that the ways are not useful.
First of all, the author suggests that can restore Torreya in the same location that it grew many years ago because that area has a specific microclimate, so, provides favorable conditions for Torreya's growth. This idea is challenged by the lecture. She says that these areas changed by climate changes. Furthermore, she mentions that global warming caused the temperature to increase in these zones, therefore, the area dried and it is unlikely Torreya to survive in these conditions.
Secondly, the writer contends that it can transfer Torreya to a different place. The article notes Torreya seeds have thrived in forests further north; consequently, seeds are able to grow in other places, and also the relocation process known as assisted migration that does by a human. The lecture, however, rebuts this by asserting that the assisted migration can create unpredicted results. She elaborates on this by mentioning one example; before, people tried to move the black locus tree to the new environment, so it grew quickly, but this tree killed other plants that were in that environment, and it caused some trees to become to extinct.
Finally, it is stated that in the article one way to save Torreya is keeping them in research centers, because scientists can monitor their environment, and researchers do easier their researches on Torreya. The lecture, on the other hand, posits that if Torreya keeps in research centers, it will get diseases because Torreya to survive needs to large space and genetically diverse, while these centers have not enough space, also they have not various population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | NIMA SAEEDI | 3 | view |
- Summaries the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. the source of quackers 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture. Being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. The vessels in ancient time 80
- Some people believe that university students should be required to attend classes. Others believe that going to classes should be optional for students. Which point of view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage.Sending human to Mars 3
- Summaries the points made in the lecture,being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. two hypotheses about see otters populations declining 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...event diminishing Torreya in some ways. The lecture challenges the methods made by ...
^^^
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...llenges the methods made by the author. The Professor is of the opinion that the wa...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1461038961 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62818408354 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.9520064278 49.2860985944 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.214285714 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0757956693699 0.272083759551 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306829362716 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302677420856 0.0662205650399 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0511913874426 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320899970576 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.