Do you agree or disagree with the following statement：
It is more beneficial for people to stop reading or listening to the news for a period of a few days or weeks.
With the rapid development of social media, people are bombarded with various kinds of messages, However, some of which are fake and aim to guide public opinion. Such a fact may mislead impressionable people to generate the opinion that it brings more advantages than shortcomings for people to quit contacting with the news for time. Nevertheless, such a statement faces both logical and factual fallacies, and it should be scrutinized rigorously. From my perspective, taking social relationship and effectiveness into account, I strongly hold the idea that being exposed to daily news will benefit people a lot.
First and foremost, constant exposure to media news can keep us up with current events, as we are able to get in touch with daily information and know more about the society we live in. Meanwhile, contacting with newly affairs and staying aware of what is happening around us is extremely essential, which makes it possible for us to react to the changes in conditions instantly. For instance, I planned a trip with my cousins to Japan last year. But the day before we left for Japan, we saw the news online that the city we were about to visit in Japan was suffering from tsunami. As a result, we reorganized our travel and finally enjoyed our holiday in ChengDu instead.
Furthermore, updating our mind with newly information everyday will help us develop a wider and solid social network. Since we are able to share and talk about current affairs with others, it will be much easier for us to make friends in common habits. During the process of communicating about news which we pay attention to, we can enlarge our scope of knowledge by exchanging information and find more friends who have similar tastes and interests with us. Take my experience for an example, I am so fascinated by archaeology that once there comes up news about archaeology I will follow-up immediately. By sharing news I gained online on campus BBS about archaeology, I met Tony who was interested in archaeology as well and then became one of my best friends. Besides, I established my interest group with schoolmates who shared the same interest with me.
Nevertheless, Some people may concern about the spam information which can disturb people’s life and attention, as a consequence, they stick to the point that stopping watching news for a few time does have its merits. Ironically, since anti-spam technique has become already very mature in the present, it is convenient and feasible for us to distinguish whether or not the information we receive is spam. And it is unwise to give up eating for fear of choking. Therefore, spam information is not a serious problem which we can totally solve by technology.
All in all, I maintain that we are supposed to keep track of the latest news
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | gongxue0102 | 98 | view |
- Some people think distance learning programmes can never be as good as courses taken in person To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more beneficial for people to stop reading or listening to the news for a period of a few days or weeks 98
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...pdating our mind with newly information everyday will help us develop a wider and solid ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 362, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ient and feasible for us to distinguish whether or not the information we receive is spam. And...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2327.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 473.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91966173362 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85621409549 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560253699789 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6291927288 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.35 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.65 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2297222995 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720991605676 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054387322184 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125286724016 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528319352453 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.