The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at the present and the future
The two diagrams compare the key elements in the water treatment system in Australia now and in the future.
Compared to the current scheme, most innovative point regarding the new system is that water will be obtained from more varying sources, recycled and no waste will be dumped into the river flowing near the city.
For now, there is only one source of water, coming from a dam, which functions as a storage. After being used by households, factories and shops in the city, waste water goes through a water treatment plant prior to being released into the river. Also, it is worth noting that storm water is not utilized at the moment, going straight from the city into the river.
The future plan still installs the dam as a source of water for the city. However, the water treatment plant will process water both after use from the city and the storm water, serving as the second supply of water for the city. The details also indicate that no waste water will be released into the river, which makes the future plan more environmentally friendly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-26 | letrang250191 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | letrang250191 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | thaocbh | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | thaocbh | 73 | view |
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university. 56
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled The say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste W 86
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 82
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure plan more environmentally friendly.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, regarding, second, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77419354839 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22360417776 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543010752688 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5460771839 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221963755668 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11080952464 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604834876634 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150408108058 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068661407978 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.