The chart provides information about the points that three different teams have received among four different seasons.
In conclusion, team B lead the highest score between the other teams, meanwhile, two other teams (team A and Team B) points were fluctuating from 2002 to 2005.
Team B reached the maximum score in 2002, they gained a total of 82 points. In the next year, their score dropped to 60 and gained the lowest score, the score was 43 in 2004. At the end of 2005, team B score was growing and gained 55 for the total points.
However, tram A had the smallest score by 5 points in 2002. On the other hand, team C attained 10 points in 2002. In the next season, In 2003, teams A and C scored moderately increased to 11 and 15 points (It reached the highest score for team C). In 2004, team A score still growth and was hitting 35 points, conversely, team C score reduced to 12. Lastly, both teams (team A and C) score fell dramatically to 8 and 5 points.
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Write about the following topic:The large number of private cars on the roads in many parts of the world has led to serious problems of pollution and may contribute to global warming. Some people think that governments should spend money for the developme 56
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The cgar below shows the total number of minutes in billions of teephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 61
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, lastly, so, still, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 788.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.37777777778 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37647939629 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 202.5 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3662238722 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222783320567 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109499949985 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586359733121 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163401827867 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591900509784 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 95.5 61.2550243902 156% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.83 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.