A person should never make an important decision alone.
People’s lives are directly impacted by decisions taken in our daily life. Moreover, vital decisions not only have consequences over our personals life but also and especially among our close family members. I personally believe that a person should seek the advice of those close to him when taken the upmost vital decisions.
First, let’s think about a decision a person needs to take regarding a job offer in another state. This decision will impact drastically his close family members. Children need to adjust to a new environment, new school and above all new friends. This might have consequences in the near future if not handled with care. in this case, consulting with the spouse is the best option and the healthier one, in order to put families interest first and not only the well-being of that family member that wishes to move. I recall, back when I was a teenager, my dad had to move to another side of town, although this was a much better neighborhood and the schools were so much nicer, I suffered a lot, I became shy because it was difficult for me to make new friends.
Second, people in powerful positions like the senate, congress and even the president, the cannot take a decision in a unilateral way. the system - the constitution- has put barriers to prevent these government officials elected by the democratic way, to prevent them from making decisions without consulting other government branches. Imagine a president with autocratic powers deciding or taking a decision over whether to use atomic force over other countries without consulting other instances of the government? We will be lost.
All in all, I strongly believe that seeking advice when taking a vital decision is imperative. No matter how convinced we are of having the right idea, others might shed light on our idea that we have not thought about.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-13 | TatianaGHGH | 76 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | prakriti malla | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-03 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
- Your friend wants to lose weight. What advice would you give to your friend and why? 70
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a large city. 60
- Smarr cars technology 75
- The knowledge we gain from personal experiences is more valuable than the knowledge we gain from books 70
- It is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...e near future if not handled with care. in this case, consulting with the spouse i...
^^
Line 9, column 115, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a unilateral way" with adverb for "unilateral"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e president, the cannot take a decision in a unilateral way. the system - the constitution- has pu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ot take a decision in a unilateral way. the system - the constitution- has put bar...
^^^
Line 9, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eral way. the system - the constitution- has put barriers to prevent these govern...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 313.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97444089457 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70051864 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603833865815 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8294710725 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93333333333 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144710739001 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480997785555 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447975933966 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840347294078 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469874766291 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.