Advertising that targets children should be banned from our televisions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Advertisements are the keystone of modern marketing. When products get launched, without a bulletin it is impossible to sell the brand new things. On the account of this phenomenon of banning announcement on the television which influence toddlers in a hasty manner, I firmly agree with this statement. My inclination will prove in the next paragraph.
Embark along with the statement of forbidding the advertisements from the TV has possessed the ability to manipulate the adolescents towards the goods. Furthermore, the government should have to testify the end product before the products get viral and bulletins start shoots the people in a bad way. Like the children, the most convincing human being, in this era most salesman tends to approach the toddlers for their own soul purpose of the earning better revenue with their poor quality things. In addition to this, they can feasibly sell the product to the juvenile as they are not mature enough to see the unpleasant side of the product.
Moreover, the Authority should have to take a step against all the bulletins which encourage children to buy the product whether it is useful or not. Generate the law in opposition to this act will be the much great approach to this emerging issue. Also, While disobeying the rule under legislative terms could cost them monetary fins will as well aid the issue.
To recapitulate, the aforementioned reasons take stands for my firm extended belief. In a nutshell, the few steps from administration can be made a gigantic effect on this phenomena and all the parents could have relief that their infants and their fiscal are safe in their places. No faker advertise and no more expenditure on the impoverished items.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a harmful way" with adverb for "harmful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...the television which influence toddlers in a harmful way, I firmly agree with this statement. My...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a bad way" with adverb for "bad"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...l and bulletins start shoots the people in a bad way. Like the children, the most convincing...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 151, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Generate
...he product whether it is useful or not. generate the law in opposition to this act will ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 250, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: As well
... great approach to this emerging issue. Also. while disobeying the rule under legisl...
^^^^
Line 9, column 250, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... great approach to this emerging issue. Also. while disobeying the rule under legisl...
^^^^
Line 9, column 256, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... approach to this emerging issue. Also. while disobeying the rule under legislative t...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 168, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ration can be made a gigantic effect on this phenomena and all the parents could hav...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06315789474 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83957001934 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610526315789 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.134198339 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.071428571 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35714285714 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102998834277 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330518599212 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285200138716 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0608351227664 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0038347943319 0.056905535591 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.