Summarize the points in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the contents of the reading. you may refer to the passage as you write.
In the lecture the professor costs doubt on the idea of reading arguing in many organization the best way to approach a new project is to make a team.
First, according to the reading in a team members have wider knowledge, ability and skills than individual person, however the professor challenges this arguing after six month every organization check the project and this project will be recognized as a whole team. The professor states that organization can not recognize the member who did well and try a lot than other group members.
Second, in the passage the author states in a team members have greater sources and can reach in answer quickly. On the oather hand ,the professor questions this claiming that in group team not only they can not find answer soon, but also take so much time to agree with each other. Professor also maintains that influential members take decision and other members may not agree with and go for further discuss.
Finally, in the lecture the professor rebut the idea of reading claiming group team cause everyone in the group do work imposed by other members to do. Professor states that in team work usually influential member take the decisions and the project may go in a wrong way. As a result the project fail.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Sattar Hassanyar | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun organization seems to be countable; consider using: 'many organizations'.
Suggestion: many organizations
...doubt on the idea of reading arguing in many organization the best way to approach a new project ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'member'?
Suggestion: member
...rst, according to the reading in a team members have wider knowledge, ability and skill...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'month' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'months'.
Suggestion: months
...essor challenges this arguing after six month every organization check the project an...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'member'?
Suggestion: member
...the passage the author states in a team members have greater sources and can reach in a...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...answer quickly. On the oather hand ,the professor questions this claiming that ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put before the verb 'work'.
Suggestion: usually work
...rs to do. Professor states that in team work usually influential member take the decisions a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ke the decisions and the project may go in a wrong way. As a result the project fail. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... and the project may go in a wrong way. As a result the project fail.
^^
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rong way. As a result the project fail.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, may, second, so, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87096774194 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53371582014 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0005231197 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.444444444 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0378731695969 0.272083759551 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0196912127708 0.0996497079465 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0165829497529 0.0662205650399 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.02973660063 0.162205337803 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019219381052 0.0443174109184 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 63.6247240618 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.