Integrated Writing Task
The lecture and the reading passage are both about archaeology in the United Kingdom. The author of the passage believes that there are three main reasons why scientific research in this field was facing problems.The lecturer, casts doubts on the claims made on the passage. He thinks that these arguments are not convincing.
First and foremost, the writer points out that a lot of artifacts are lost because of the construction projects. In recent years the numbers of buildings were increased, as a result of high population. The lecturer challenged this point. she says that with the development of a new plan, any construction would not start before all the proper examination completed. Furthermore, she argues that if all steps of the plan are not applied, then people who were involved had to turn back and complete them. Therefore, under these rules, the archaeological findings would be preserved.
The second argument the author gives is that the lack of financial support is another reason why the archaeology is behind in its work. However, the lecturer contradicts this point. she said that the financial support would be available. The construction companies would give the funds for these research , so archaeologists would be able to excavate further.
Finally, the author states that there is very difficult to pursue the career of archaeology. people who liked this profession tended to work for free because the opportunities were limited. The lecturer on the other hand, points out that with the new government plan, the opportunities for these jobs are available at all stages of the process. Therefore, people who are interested in this field, would have a lot of opportunities. In addition, because of this, today the number of people who are pursuing this career have drastically increased.
- Tpo 36 3
- TPO 24- integrated writing task 86
- TPO integrated task 40 85
- Do you agree or disagree？A good leader should admit his bad decisions and accept them. 63
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed by humans activity. Others feel that humans activity makes the Earth a better place to live. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssage believes that there are three main reasons why scientific research in this...
^^
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s that there are three main reasons why scientific research in this field was fa...
^^
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntific research in this field was facing problems.The lecturer, casts doubts on t...
^^
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...arch in this field was facing problems.The lecturer, casts doubts on the claims ma...
^^^
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...arch in this field was facing problems.The lecturer, casts doubts on the claims ma...
^^^
Line 11, column 239, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...on. The lecturer challenged this point. she says that with the development of a new...
^^^
Line 11, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... start before all the proper examination completed. Furthermore, she argues that ...
^^
Line 21, column 183, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...r, the lecturer contradicts this point. she said that the financial support would b...
^^^
Line 21, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...companies would give the funds for these research , so archaeologists would be ab...
^^
Line 21, column 306, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...would give the funds for these research , so archaeologists would be able to exca...
^^
Line 31, column 94, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...lt to pursue the career of archaeology. people who liked this profession tended to wor...
^^^^^^
Line 31, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for free because the opportunities were limited. The lecturer on the other hand,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35714285714 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87993185147 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.609864403 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 4.19205298013 286% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.