- Leaders, be it business, politics, and education, have shaped the course of history. They are the ones who lead and set an example for the rest of the society. Some leaders took his/her terms for a long period due to stability and insight that short-term positions cannot not generate, whereas others may as well be supplanted at regular intervals to forestall stagnancy and revive the entity. I disagree with the claim since not all leaders should step down after five years, with the valid opposition against the reason aforementioned. There are other primary factors that contribute to determining success of the enterprise than new leadership.
- Granted, in politics, it is dangerous for political leaders to assume their role for more than five years. Throughout the early human history, monarchy was deemed as a paradigm of ruling with consistency and continuity of policies and political activities assured. In the case of Roman Empires, which is considered to be one of the most thriving nations once in history, a probing question deserved closer scrutiny is then why it did not succeed in lasting forever. The reason why more than half of countries in the world nowadays have adopted democracy over monarchy is in such intrinsic feature that marks corruption and degeneration of monarchy. Those in power end up with abusing power, stories of embezzlements and appropriation abound, and briberies, frauds, and nepotism never fail to appear in the front pages of historical books. Take Adolf Hitler for an extreme example. During his long-term reign granted with absolute power and no limitations imposed on him, he took extensive measures to implement his supremacist and racially motivated policies. This racial hygiene resulted in the systematic murder, especially known as the Holocaust, the World War II genocide of the European Jews. If Hitler’s term was hampered to five years, many lives would not have been sacrificed and many tragic incidents would not have been recorded in history. Hence, terms of political leaders should be limited to five years.
- However, it is hasty to follow the stated argument since it is not applicable to those in authority in other fields, such as business. In other words, prolonged leadership is conducive to successful path for enterprises in business sectors. To illustrate, Bill Gates, the chairman of Microsoft, the world’s largest personal-computer software company, held primary responsibility for the company’s product strategy from its founding to 2006. Due to this long period in power where he could fully realize his potentials, he could not only create the Windows program but diversify the company’s range of products through his knowledge and experience. Consequently, he climbed the ladder of success and the company’s popularity soared quickly as products sold worldwide.
- Moreover, revitalization through new leader is not the most powerful key to ensure success. Primarily attributable to success in business sectors is creativity. Take an example of Steve Jobs, an American entrepreneur and inventor, best known as CEO of Apple Inc. During his long-time position to run the company, his innovative ideas play a more crucial role in the success of Apple. Whiles others placed emphasis on the function of computers and cell phones, he was the creative one to emphasize the vital role of aesthetics. His stylish designs and creativity had led to the initial success of the firm. Furthermore, when Apple was losing its competition against Microsoft’s Windows platforms models, returning to Apple and taking power, he instigated several state-of-the-art technological products, such as iPod. Thanks to his outside-of-the-box ideas, Apple was able to regain its popularity and revive its stagnant businesses. All things considered, innovation is a more essential key to the success of an enterprise, overriding new leadership.
- In brief, not people in all fields should step down after five years. New leadership is not the surest path to success. What truly matters is keeping enterprises abreast of changes and constant attempts to innovation, breaking old boxes that contain old thoughts limiting desirable potentials to be materialized.
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed. 75
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 82
- In any profession business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be 91
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning f 77
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most c 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, whereas, while, in brief, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 97.0 58.6224719101 165% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3589.0 2235.4752809 161% => OK
No of words: 661.0 442.535393258 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42965204236 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.07049507093 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06928649994 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 372.0 215.323595506 173% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56278366112 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 1116.9 704.065955056 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.2370786517 158% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3497477907 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.15625 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.65625 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141644310417 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364474472883 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599148451659 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854644616994 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551984616678 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 222.0 100.480337079 221% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.