The given line graph illustrates the carbon dioxide that was emitted by people of four different countries during 1967-2007.
In terms of United Kingdom and Sweden, both countries experienced a downward trend in the given period. Around 11 and 9 metric tonnes CO2 emitted by both countries residents in 1967. The figure of United Kingdom declined slowly and registered at 8 metric tonnes approximately in 2007. In contrast, there was a significant rise seen in the figure of Sweden people. Before reaching at lowest point at about 5 metric tonnes, it experienced a jump at exactly 10 metric tonnes in 1977.
To regard with Italy and Portugal, both nations showed a small increase in the last years. In 1967, around 4.2 metric tonnes CO2 released by Italians which was almost double than that of Portugal (1.5 metric tonnes). Moreover, the data for Italians increased gradually and registered at precisely 6 in 1977, it again went up slowly and reached at around 7.8 metric tonnes in 2007.In the case of Portuguese, by 1997, it had increased with almost 2 metric tonnes. Interestingly, the CO2 emission by Portugal citizens remained almost constant from 1997 to 2007,at roughly 5 metric tonnes.
Overall, as can be seen, the maximum emission of Co2 was registered by UK and Sweden people in initial period, but it showed downward trend in the last years. on the other side, least amount of CO2 released by Italians and Portuguese while these followed an inward trend in the last years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...hed at around 7.8 metric tonnes in 2007.In the case of Portuguese, by 1997, it had...
^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2 was registered by UK and Sweden people in initial period, but it showed downwar...
^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...howed downward trend in the last years. on the other side, least amount of CO2 rel...
^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
...end in the last years. on the other side, least amount of CO2 released by Italians and ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 26.3917525773 189% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 937.175257732 133% => OK
No of words: 250.0 206.0 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.968 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.78020617076 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6141155292 2.54303337028 103% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 127.690721649 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 366.3 290.88556701 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 1.44329896907 762% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6804123711 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.8708493294 44.8134815571 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 76.5299724578 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 16.8248392259 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.08333333333 4.34317383033 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 2.54639175258 157% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138849733388 0.216113520407 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623413162264 0.0766984524023 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387635192155 0.0603063233224 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960643905562 0.12726935374 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272372547529 0.0580467560999 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 8.37731958763 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 70.7449484536 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 8.71597938144 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 41.2886597938 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.