frogs habitat fungus pesticides human activities
The passage stays that there is a dangerous decrease of frogs' population due to several changes in the ecosystem. With the objective of getting a solution to this problem, the author proposes three main methods: a) reducing pesticides; b) control of harming fungus and; c) checking human activities within their habitat. The lecture challenges the claim made by the article. She considers that this methods are not the best way to confront the problem.
First, the author of the text propose that pesticides must be forbidden. If farmers are not using pesticide in their crops, then frogs would not be harmed. However, the lecture argues that this prohibition would have dramatical consequences on the economical sustanbility. Farmers could loss their crops, and be less competitive in the market.
Secondly, the passage affirms that fungus infections causes that frog is treatened. Nevertheless, the vaccine agains the illness produced is not a practical solution mainly because it is not applicable at a large scale and it would not be transfer its effects in the offsprings.
Lastly, the author posits that the enviroment of the frogs, specially wetlands, should be protected from human activities. Although it it true human activities change the enviroment, it is the global warning which is making the biggest damage. That is the reason why the proffesor argues that we must deal with the problem in a world scale.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 392, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...made by the article. She considers that this methods are not the best way to confron...
^^^^
Line 13, column 133, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...otected from human activities. Although it it true human activities change the enviro...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 139, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'trues'?
Suggestion: trues
...d from human activities. Although it it true human activities change the enviroment,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23913043478 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78112732307 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604347826087 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8707083742 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6923076923 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6923076923 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.06452816374 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252476473318 0.272083759551 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682723690322 0.0996497079465 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749910092077 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123086819234 0.162205337803 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427619013103 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.