The table reveals information about the numbers of travellers who visited Ashdown museum, while the pie charts demonstrate information related to visitors satisfaction from result of surveys in the year before and after the museum was redecorated.
Overall, total number of guests increased and the proportion of guests rated the services "very satisfied" or "satisfied" also increased after it was redeveloped.
To begin with, only 74000 people visited museum during the year before refurbishment, which increased to 92000 after it was redecorated. According to survey, 15% of visitors were "extremely dissatisfied" with their services prior to renovation, while this percentage increased to more than double after refurbishing made. Furthermore, the percentage of visitors who felt " satisfied" was 30%, which increased by 10% after the year redevelopment ocured.
On the other hand, a significant change was noted in dissatisfaction level of travellers. Before refurbiahment, almost one out of three visitors felt "dissatisfaction", which decreased significantaly to only 15% after certain changes made into museum. Furthermore, one-tenth of total visitors felt " extremely dissatisfied", which decreased by 5% after it was renewed. Moreover, visitors who did not respond to the survey remain stable at 5% in both period.
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 67
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 61
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07614213198 4.92477711251 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.97514761385 2.65546596893 150% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598984771574 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.45097560976 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5205823706 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297905865573 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13742395992 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844844079262 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197155165732 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982524219917 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 61.2550243902 40% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.98 11.4140731707 158% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07614213198 4.92477711251 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.97514761385 2.65546596893 150% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598984771574 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.45097560976 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5205823706 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297905865573 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13742395992 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844844079262 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197155165732 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982524219917 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 61.2550243902 40% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.98 11.4140731707 158% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.