Multiple graphs
There are two charts, the first chart depicts the number of male and female adult studying in the four distinct courses in 2009. The second chart illustrates the proportion of the participant's ages in these courses
Generally, it is noticable that language was the most popular course by woman, while majority men preferred to study painting. We can also see that the elderly, 50 or over, accounted for the largest proportion of adults going to courses.
Regarding to the first paragraph, many women joined to the language course at 40 people, which was twofold number of male participants. Painting and drama were dominated by female learners, in which the number of female in painting courses was five people much higher than male participants, at only 25 people, while drama showed that female was twofold of male students at 10 people. Furthermore, sculpture was only 10 and 5 participants, in male and female respectively.
In the term of the percentages of aged participants, elderly people who were 50 or over was 42%, while the adult under 20 was only one in twenty. The number of 20-29 aged participants joining the courses was a minority, at 11%, while the number of adults who were between 30-39 aged was over than a fifth, which are counted together at only 26%. It was same proportion as the participants in 40-49 aged.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-28 | shyam kumar | view | |
| 2020-02-03 | zuli | 11 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91189427313 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73296807139 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515418502203 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7904838188 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.888888889 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.