Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
As Gandhi said in his struggle for freedom,' Without our comrades, independence would have been a long lost dream.'
Although a remarkable leader, there had been many instances where Gandhiji found it difficult to exercise his moral judgements which would inturn disrespect his fellow peers during independence struggle. There are many reasons why sound moral judgement takes precedence over respecting your peers. Such as - Moral judgment by the masses and moral judgement by an individual is subject to variance. For eg; morally speaking state sponsered execution or hanging of an individual for crimes against society personally makes me feel is a wrongdoing. But when mob mentality is brought into this equation, hanging is usually not considered a wrongdoing.
Second, as a leader it is the leaders responsibility to set a precedent to his peers that in tough situations leaders have to take tough decisions. Lastly, it is always the leader who is held responsible for the decisions taken by him. This is what makes the decision making process personal.
There are also some arguements against the above thesis. Such as - Though how much ever knowledgable a leader is, it is always better to have many brains involved in solving a problem than only one brain. A leader may not be able to envisage all the dimensions of problem.
Second, by not taking into consideration his peers advice, he might also instigate a feeling of being undermined by their leader amongst the peers. This is considered a bad news for unity of team. Therefore, respecting peers bring a sense of unity amongst the group collectively.
In the end, a leader has to understand the complexity of problem he is dealing with and accordingly take help from his peers to understand the various approaches to solve the problem. This will help him shape his judgement in such a way that it will be an answer straight from his heart and he is also the one convinced with his answer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...ngdoing. Second, as a leader it is the leaders responsibility to set a precedent to hi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'bad news'.
Suggestion: bad news
...r amongst the peers. This is considered a bad news for unity of team. Therefore, respectin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, lastly, may, second, so, therefore, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 327.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99082568807 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80384222323 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565749235474 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9562647908 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2352941176 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58823529412 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271310172528 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783661411956 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625721530186 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122441629112 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646307955473 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.