Many people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society.
To what extent do you agree?
social network has been a controversial topic. Some people concern that this type of site can cause detrimental effects on personal and thus the general society might be seriously affected. I definitely agree with this point of view since social network is the origin of violent behaviours and the decrease of people’s living quality. this essay will discuss the reason why.
With regards to individuals, network society is where online bullying rampaging. We can easily witness hundreds comments of intimidation, threatening words written by the crowd that target to one fragile individual. In addition, online offensive behaviours can appear in racist, body shaming or catcalling posts. These vulgar words may lead to violence in real world, cause mental sickness such as anxiety disorder to the targeted person. More harmfully, the victim who undergoes the intense pressure from online bullying can commit suicide.
On the other hand, the excessive use of social networking sites lay negative effects on the society. Nowadays, Both children and adults spend too much time using electronic devices for playing games and consuming content on social network. The consequences of overusing social network for entertaining purposes are emasculation of creative ability and lack of life experience. Just imagine what if the future generations will remember nothing about the present days and their childhood memories but the videos they will have watched on the tablets? Besides, staring at the screen for entertaining in a long time
create laziness among office employees, which can reduce the working quality of the professional environment.
In conclusion, although the fact that there are several benefits of social networking sites, individuals need to aware of negative effect from them to prevent severe consequences.
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S. from 1960 to 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- In many places people s lifestyles are changing rapidly and this a ects family relationships Do you think the advantages of such developments outweigh the disadvantages 11
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Social
social network has been a controversial topic....
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...he decrease of people’s living quality. this essay will discuss the reason why. ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 612, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e screen for entertaining in a long time create laziness among office employees, ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Create
...een for entertaining in a long time create laziness among office employees, which ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64642857143 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77745800314 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.696428571429 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7207648806 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199892933365 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595350399578 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510006394471 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088900912123 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599954382508 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.