the line graph shows comparison of car theft per thousand vehicles in four European countries between 1990 and 1999.
The line graph illustrates the changing patterns in the proportion of cars stolen in Great Britain, Sweden, France and Canada over the course of 9 years starting in 1990.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately evident that the car theft figures in Great Britain and France saw an increase before falling in 1999. While the rate of car theft in Sweden witnessed an upward trend, a progressive decline was seen in the car theft figures in Canada. At the end of the surveyed period, car stolen in Great Britain registered the highest proportion out of four countries examined.
In 1990, the number of car were stolen in Great Britain was about 17%. This figure climbed to approximately 20% by between 1990 and 1996 before dropping to 16% by 1999. A similar pattern was seen in France where car theft rates rose from 6% to about 7% between 1990 and 1995 before decreasing to 5% by the end of the period.
At the beginning of the period, the car theft figure in Sweden was only shy of nearly 9%. This figure resurged to about 14%, an increase of 5% in 9 years. Contrary to this, the figure in Canada gradually dwindled from about 6% to 5% afterwards.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-01 | MattNewhouse95 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59903381643 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4431170137 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502415458937 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7253509701 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.1 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227625901321 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09671862813 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051936814733 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14346688672 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616011972494 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.