In today’s hectic and competitive world, a gap year has been becoming a trend between students. It is opined by some that it is better to attend college straight away while this essay is trying to refute this notion. Throughout the following paragraphs, among the most predominant reasons in support of this contention knowing real interests and upgrading of skillsets will be meticulously scrutinized to advocate this standpoint that having at least one year gap between high school and the university is an intelligent decision.
To commence with, a gap year is an opportunity to spend more time for knowing yourself and your interests. University is like an endless long journey that a year off helps you to become more mature and meticulously scrutinize your future schedules before attending college. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what has elaborated above. Here, I depict one of my own experiences. Regarding the experience of high pressure and stress throughout high school, a doctor advised me to be far from any tension, so I decided to make a traveling plan to another country. That trip not only guided me to become mentally refresh but also aid to be familiarized with one who changed my viewpoints and insight into my real inclination. Experiencing volunteer work on her company assisted me to figure out my real interest and major. Accordingly, during a year off you can readily pursue your curiosities that lead to opt the right one based on your enthusiasm.
Furthermore, a year off broad your horizon and improve your skillsets. Throughout this circumstance, adolescents can learn a new language, develop their coding skills, etc. Not only do youngsters obtain novel experiences but also prepare themselves for an appropriate job by attending prerequisites. To more clarify the condition, I mention the outcome of one survey conducted in AUT School to probe the impact of the gap year on students. Over 80% of the youngsters who take part in internships or volunteer works have more confidence in their job interviews and better insight in terms of their majors. Therefore, a gap year is counted as an invaluable period to augment your weaknesses besides earning new prowesses.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that it is more advantageous for students to have a gap year during their academic eras and I do recommend parents to encourage their child to have at least a year off in their academic spans between college and school.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All school teachers should be required to attend courses every 5 years to update their knowledge 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement After high school students should have at least one year to work or travel It 039 s better than attending university straight away 86
- 11 In times of an economic crisis in which area should governments reduce their spending 1 Arts2 Scientific research3 Parks and public gardens The Preference type three sides of the issue should be discussed but focusing on one 90
- Do you agree or disagree Some people believe that video games could inspire young students interest and make their study more efficient rather than distracting them and a waste of time so young students should be allowed to play video games 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students can get asmany benefits from organization or club activities as they can get from theiracademic studies 90
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 958, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the right one based on your enthusiasm. Furthermore, a year off broad your horiz...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01946472019 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9554683533 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564476885645 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8061299737 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.611111111 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246339838113 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643150197999 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461942207727 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148347493398 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314159717577 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
I like that statement, and I…
I like that statement, and I agree that there is no sense in rushing to choose where and what to study.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 958, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the right one based on your enthusiasm. Furthermore, a year off broad your horiz...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2063.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01946472019 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9554683533 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564476885645 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8061299737 48.9658058833 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.611111111 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246339838113 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643150197999 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461942207727 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148347493398 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314159717577 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.