Children brought up in families with less money are better prepared for life than those from wealthy families. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons and include example
Naturally children grow up by seeing their parent’s attitude and behaviour. Children easily get influenced to both positive and negative activities what they observe. So, parents should be careful with their behaviour before children. Basically, kids from poorer families have a greater view on their future whereas the children from wealthy families take their life easier. I totally agree to this argument and reason are explained in the following passage.
On one hand, Children from less wealthy families always feel responsible for survival of their families. Accordingly, they are known with the hard work done by their parents to make their children happy and fulfil their wishes. However, this makes them to think beyond their age. At the same time, the family situations lead them to concentrate more on their education to have a bright future. Indirectly, knowing about family position and responsibilities at the early age make them to be prepared for their lifetime responsibilities. For example, one of my friend in my home town whose father is a carpenter studied well and got a good job in most reputed company with a good salary where as other friend whose father is head of my town studied with ease and now he is still searching for his job.
On the other hand, parents should teach their children about the value of their life and doing hard work to have a successful life. Irrespective to the age of kids one should be thought responsibilities and value of time. Consequently, teachers and parents both has the responsibility to make a student to learn about career planning and how one can have a better life in the future.
After having considered all the above discussed points, we can finally draw a conclusion that children should not be over pampered and know about their status. One should be thought about hard work and value of studies in life then only they can have a good life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-18 | saipriyanka | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-18 | saipriyanka | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-18 | isha211087 | 92 | view |
- write a letter to an organizer about the hotel you stayed who booked the hotel for you meeting details What you did not like about the hotel what you want organizer to do
- Children brought up in families with less money are better prepared for life than those from wealthy families To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons and include example 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
- The Internet when used as a source of information has more drawbacks than advantages To what extent do you agree with this statement 66
- You will go to London soon to stay there for one year Write a letter to an agency to get information about accommodation In your letter you should say why you are going to London what kind of accommodation you want when you will arrive 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...most reputed company with a good salary where as other friend whose father is head of m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 694, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uted company with a good salary where as other friend whose father is head of my ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, finally, however, if, so, still, then, well, whereas, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95975232198 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68719949567 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53560371517 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7761148002 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19298249137 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722542903342 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603518823982 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119724882338 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665637531224 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.