The following pie charts compare about amount of water used for three distinct purposes in six different parts of the world.
It is apparent that a much larger portion of water used for agricultural purpose whereas North America and Europe used less quantity of water as compared to rest of the four areas of the world shown on the graph.
Over 80% of water used by Central Asia, South East Asia and Africa for agricultural perspective while South Americans consumed only 71% of water for their agricultural reason. Domestically South Americans used almost two times more water rather than the Asians and Africans which is accounted as 19%. But a similar trend observed among Asians and Africans during using of water into industry which is more or less 10%.
On the other hand, North America and Europe consumed in average 50% of water to run the industrial processes. By contrast, less than 40% of water consumed for cultivation. 13% and 15% water used by the North Americans and Europeans respectively which is slightly higher than the Asians and Africans.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 78
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and show how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 84
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 75
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 69
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, while, more or less, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97206703911 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52295104639 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575418994413 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1172099622 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228712450285 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111274022518 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0884173612722 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174679648472 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882204711603 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.