Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree or disargee with this statement?
Governments indeed play a pivotal role in developing the country’s economy. However, it is necessary to concentrate resources in public services rather than recreation fields, such as composing songs or making movies. This essay is going to explain my argument and propose some effective solutions to allocate financial sources reasonably.
There are several reasons why the authority has not to pour money into the arts. Firstly, there is a growing number of more urgent social issues that need to be addressed by the government. For instance, the appearance of a new virus called Covid-19 poses a threat to countries’ health care systems all over the world. To solve this menace, the officials must ensure well-funded public health care services and state-of-the-art devices to make up the viable vaccine. Secondly, the people who invest in the arts should be enterprises or artists because it is of interest. As can be seen in exhibitions, authors or copyright holders could benefit from displaying their works-of-the-art and earn a bunch of money.
For these reasons, the state budget should be disbursed into areas logically to secure residents’ living standards and the growth of various genres of the arts. This means the authority should mainly invest in improving the quality of public services including education, healthcare, and infrastructure. In contrast, the officials should boost the arts industry by introducing policies which give enterprises tax discount as a way to encourage them. Besides, local councils should support only creative engravers who produce the carving about national culture, heritage or historical figures.
In short, money for art projects should come from alternative financial sources instead of the government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | hanhkatori2402 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-30 | thuhuyen29042006 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | Huonglando1710 | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arts'' or 'art's'?
Suggestion: arts'; art's
...ontrast, the officials should boost the arts industry by introducing policies which ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in contrast, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53505535055 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98438449881 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664206642066 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.0478114242 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.142857143 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201170507629 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604752384987 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511566883062 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111799929443 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024193140559 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.