TPO 33
The reading and lecture are about purpose of circular balls that date from before approximately four thousand years. In the article, the three possible explanation was proposed about the case. The lecturer is the opinion that these interpretations are faulty.
Firstly, the author states that grooves were found from the place where stones were found, and these two tools probably was attached to each other and utilized as weapons. This specific argument was challenged by the lecturer. She mentions that if it was employed as equipment it would have been deteriorated as other neolithic weapons such as axes and arrows. However, its surface was well maintained and smooth, which contradicts the idea mentioned in the reading.
Secondly, in the passage, it is claimed that the stones were being used for measurement because its size is consistent and suitable for resembling standard unit. Nonetheless, the lecturer refutes this understanding by remarking that density of the material utilized for making the stones. Therefore, their weight was different although their size is similar to each other, which means that the stones are unsuitable for employed to weigh masses of other objects.
Finally, the author mentions the stone may was used for indicating hierarchy of aristocrats because they have intricate layout. The lecturer, however, posits that design of the stone is simple although they are carved in a mark. Moreover, the tools were being buried with their owners during the period from which the artifact dates. Actually, the stones were not found from any cemetery but other areas, which proves that it was not indicator of social rank of their possessor.
- TPO 23 78
- Like many creatures humpback whales migrate long distances for feeding and mating purposes How animals manage to migrate long distances is often puzzling In the case of humpback whales we may have found the answer they may be navigating by the stars much 45
- TPO 27 80
- During our careers we work with many different kinds of people All of them have unique characteristics and personality traits In your opinion which of the following is the most important characteristic of a coworker a serious attitude regarding their work 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television has destroyed communication among friends and family 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 10.4613686534 239% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29588014981 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59658899408 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9268673268 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06452816374 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318566784654 0.272083759551 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943772013629 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646663933312 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172403636383 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663526456734 0.0443174109184 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.