The bar graph compares the ten different nation's production and usage of electricity for the year 2014. Figures measured are in billion kWh.
In an overview, it can be seen that majority of the countries are producing more electric energy than they consume in the year 2014. China is the highest producer as well as consumer of the electricity whereas Korea Republic consumed and produced the least amount of electricity. China's production and consumption is almost five times more than that of other compared nations except the USA.
Among these nations, United States has the largest difference between their utilization (3,866 billion kWh) and production (4,099 billion kWh) of electricity. Germany is the only Country who consumed (582.5 billion kWh) more than they produced (526.6 billion kWh). Russia's electricity production and consumption is almost equal with least difference between 1,057 and 1,038 billion kWh respectively. Brazil with 455.8 billion kWh is the second lowest consumer of electricity but according to its production (530.7 billion kWh), it ranks the third lowest.
- households owning and renting accommodation in england and wales 1918 to 2011 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...he bar graph compares the ten different nations production and usage of electricity for...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
... the year 2014. Figures measured are in billion kWh. In an overview, it can be seen ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
...duction and consumption is almost equal with least difference between 1,057 and 1,038 bill...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, third, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38823529412 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68570482008 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6443007527 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.857142857 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124951222197 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750317922278 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564536415624 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110220341501 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450656030519 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.