A marriage ceremony has become increasingly popular among certain demographics of society. In recent years, these individuals’ preferences to conduct a luxurious wedding has been rising. This essay will argue that why spending a huge sum of money on a deluxe wedding is entirely preposterous despite some beneficial aspects such as a confidence boost.
People have always been wary of how to attend their wedding ceremony as well. They think conducting an expensive wedding is the best way to show their friends or other people how much they are happy and feel satisfied with their spouse. Besides, these high-priced marriage ceremonies are very popular, and it has been a tradition or even rule among some developed countries. For example, in India, couples should invite many people and spend huge money to reserve a top-class hall with a well-qualified dinner. However, it is not limited to one ceremony and they have many celebrations which last for a week or more. These few aspects have justified spending so much money on the wedding ceremony.
Despite the minor benefits associated with spending huge money on wedding ceremonies, the idea that it is a positive development is completely unacceptable. One of the most negative effects of such a luxurious wedding tends to promote consumerism, materialism, and narcissism. Couples can invest heavily in their business or other essential affairs. They can save a large sum of money, so that it allows them to plan for their future. Overall. The idea that attending an expensive wedding is a positive attitude is superficial and pointless and potentially leads to a far worse outcome for society.
This essay argued that couples who spend huge money on a marriage party have a superficial understanding of moral life and underestimate the effect of what they do. In my opinion, couples should reduce their ambition in order to keep within the budget and save a lot of money to carry out future needs.
- In many countries weddings are getting bigger and more expensive than the past Is this a positive or negative development 68
- Some people believe that face to face communication is always more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your own opinion and include relevant examples 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e effect of what they do. In my opinion, couples should reduce their ambition in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, well, for example, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09316770186 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86578493167 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8859297421 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1875 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148663421345 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483543412349 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383112484903 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853272384711 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04454529942 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.