The graph shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992
The line graph demonstrates the proportions of British people over four years old who watched television and who listened to the radio over the course of twenty-four hours in 1992.
Overall, all of the figures experienced dramatically fructuated changes through several different timelines in the day. In particular, the percentage of television viewers registered a sharp increase while the number of radio audiences kept falling drastically, especially in the evening.
At about a quarter past six, the percentage of people who watched television was about over 3%, while the figure for radio users was double that amount and after 2 hours, it rose to respectively 27%, which is also the peak of the number of radio listeners. However, after that time, numerous people instantly stopped listening to the radio, which led to a significant drop in the proportion of radio audiences. In contrast, from the 10 a.m onwards, the figure for television audiences experienced a slow but steady growth. As a result, by 8 p.m, the number of UK citizens over the age of four watching television had reached a peak of nearly 45%, while the number of people still sticking with the radio had stood at merely around one-fifth of that amount.
After 8 p.m, the proportions of both television and radio audiences experienced a downward trend. People gradually stopped using entertainment devices, including televisions and radios; therefore, the number of users considerably decreased to approximately 2%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-03 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... twenty-four hours in 1992. Overall, all of the figures experienced dramatically fructu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...dramatically fructuated changes through several different timelines in the day. In particular, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, in contrast, in particular, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31932773109 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98798289904 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4909232767 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.666666667 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4444444444 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2222222222 5.23603664747 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261029856272 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112118832164 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531125324733 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160462365529 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0044445482618 0.0819641961636 5% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.