In the last few decades the days of work have become controversial issue by developing in industry, science and so on. In my point of view work only three days with long time working is better. I will explore my reasons in the following essay.
To begin with, in this case you have much more time and more intact empty days. Therefor you can do more than one serious expert simultaneously. If you go to work many days you will be tired in the end of day and there is no energy and do it barely. In addition you lose lots of time in commute..
A compelling example which I experiment is when I resigned from my work in a company with many days and in contrast, was employed in the office with few despite efficient days. This situation had been able me to continue my academic study and attend university. In that time I was juggling my work and study , in consequence I entered workforce with high salary and upper social position.
Second, in one day we have more time without too gaps. In order we work centralized and snap to work avidly. I have one example to demonstrate this idea. Apple Company is well kwon for each individual. This company had a wide scale on the comments of workforce. They observe the after clap of trial and unpredictably had seen many employers believed on few gaps have made them comfortable and efficient energy. So the company had implied some changes in days and vividly saw the result in raising the annual revenue and productivity.
In conclusion, few days give you a suitable chance to augment diversity of experts and then avoid to perishable time and take a best advantage from time that know as gold. I suggest rethink about your job and devote your time in the intellectual way.
- A little over 2 200 years ago the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse According to some ancient historians the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a burning mirror a polished copper surface curved to focus the Sun s 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 81
- A little over 2 200 years ago the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse According to some ancient historians the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a burning mirror a polished copper surface curved to focus the Sun s 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 81
- A little over 2 200 years ago the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse According to some ancient historians the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a burning mirror a polished copper surface curved to focus the Sun s 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 253, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...there is no energy and do it barely. In addition you lose lots of time in commute.. A ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 294, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ddition you lose lots of time in commute.. A compelling example which I experime...
^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...at time I was juggling my work and study , in consequence I entered workforce with...
^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... then avoid to perishable time and take a best advantage from time that know as g...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, then, well, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54340836013 5.08290768461 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58446839923 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569131832797 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 2.5761589404 388% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7080606942 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.3684210526 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3684210526 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31578947368 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30674458847 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09146313457 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654238284473 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166188254425 0.162205337803 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848963233092 0.0443174109184 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.3589403974 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 12.2367328918 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.