Many things can influence the academic achievement and emotional growth of a student Peers have more of an impact than teachers
It is a common belief that a student’s performance and emotional development experience more impact from educators than from their classmates. However, I maintain that one’s friends can present more powerful influences than their tutors because they can help them to complete their tasks effectively and become grown-up gradually by cooperating with them.
To begin with, students will try to enhance themselves certainly that can lead to better performance in the intensely competitive atmosphere in classes. In other words, they have more stress on their horizons and scores in comparison with their peers. Indeed, rivalry with each other results in the overwhemingly fierce in classes, where adolescents study the same material at the same pace. According to the Oxford survey recently, the average of the highest coveted awards belongs to the colleges where establish more competition related to social and scientific knowledge. As a result, this activity will be conscientious and industrious because the huge desire to be the first ranking and to show off the wide knowledge can be aroused.
On top of that, social communication at schools allows students to cultivate the team spirit and to get more significant skills in teamwork. To put in another way, throughout their studying period, adolescents can recognize clearly that social circle is indispensable to survive in the study environment. For example, it can help them to maintain that friendly bond, by teaching them how to be good listeners. And with a true friend by your side, know that your happiness will be doubled, and sadness will be halved. According to the Social club in America, 42% of children have a high moral standard go to school-environment more than the figure for studying at home.
To sum up, classmates create scholarly competition and help students become more mature. For this reason, it is easy to see that adolescents will be more academically motivated and become more grown-up by socialising with others at school.
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 87
- the graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in different parts of the world 78
- The internet is viewed as an excellent means of communication but some people suggest that it may not the best place to find information 84
- The graph below gives information about how much people in the United States and the United Kingdom spend on petrol Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, for example, as a result, in other words, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28348909657 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95318558705 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566978193146 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3782435556 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.142857143 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179781460877 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635798345604 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476107375364 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11977607579 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047885560149 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.