Do you agree or disagree that it is more important for universities to spend money on facilities such as libraries and laboratories than hiring famous teachers?
In order to help students to performance better in college and achieve future success, universities decide to spend money on making new tactics, such as building facilities and hiring famous teachers. From my perspective, I do not agree with that one strategy is more significant than another. On the contrary, I am all for that both are of importance.
On the one hand, setting up varieties of facilities is a good approach to offer special places for students to enjoy studying and organize activities, which means students can have the chance to experience campus life better. And this kind of assistance is essential and impossible provide by famous teachers. When students are seeking a room full of learning atmosphere to prepare for examination, library is the best choice; when students have the demand for practicing experiments, it will be helpful if there are enough laboratories used for operating; when students are occupied with academic assigning and need to take a break, they could go to the music center to get relax. So, there is no doubt that it is extremely worth paying for building facilities since students can study and live more convenient through utilizing these establishments. Spending money on facilities is necessary and benefits students a lot.
On the other hand, as I mentioned, the help of the site is different from the help of the people. Hiring famous teachers to educate students is as important as facilities. For example, my university used to rank low in the country. Later, numerous teachers were hired to teach us, who are specialized in their researching fields and have abundant knowledge and teaching experience. They told us how to improve ourselves and gave a hand to acquire professional skills solidly. Thanks to their effort, we take advantage of their scholarship and our university becomes increasingly outstanding. It proves that famed professors come in handy on raising students’ score and even guide them about the graduation and future. Thus, universities are supposed to concentrate on developing the power of teaching and pay much money for teachers’ salary is also crucial.
To put it in a nut shell, facilities and teachers are both important enough to catch the universities’ point of view. Colleges should spend sufficient money on improving them so that they can educate more students with high quality.
- Nowadays children rely too much on the technology like computers smartphone video games for fun and entertainment playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for the children s development 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing sports can teach people lessons about the life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- At some universities students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus such as how many hours that the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria But at some 90
- Do you agree or disagree young people should try many different kinds of jobs or career before they decide the long term career of their life 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important investment of a company is to improve the skills of its employees Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, thus, for example, kind of, no doubt, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18393782383 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95150040949 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582901554404 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.7083215564 48.9658058833 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.166666667 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318830866829 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917953500156 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689317562632 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198364655493 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602247267988 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, thus, for example, kind of, no doubt, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18393782383 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95150040949 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582901554404 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.7083215564 48.9658058833 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.166666667 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27777777778 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318830866829 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917953500156 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689317562632 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198364655493 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602247267988 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.