Cafe
The argument claims that the decision of the owner of Cumquat Café to move to a new location has been successful as the café will soon celebrate its second anniversary in the new location. The line of reasoning is that since Cumquat Café left its old location, three different businesses have occupied its former location. Stated in this way, the argument fails to mention several key factors, based on which it could be evaluated. In addition, the argument reveals examples of a leap of faith, poor reasoning and ill-defined terminology. The final conclusion of the argument relies on assumptions for which there is no clear evidence. Hence, the argument is unconvincing and has several flaws.
First, the argument readily assumes Cumquat Cafes’ move to a new business location is evidently a good decision. To support the claim, the author refers to the soon second anniversary of Cumquat Café in the location. Stated in this way, the argument is a stretch and not sufficient substantiated. Not only is the claim ambiguous because of the word evidently but also the argument does not show any supporting data. The reference to the soon second anniversary weakens the argument as it does not show any business data. For example, the revenue of Cumquat coffee could have been massively decreased during the last two years, and the café only survives because of its drawn credit line. Or the generated revenue just pays the rent. Therefore, the argument could have been much clearer if it explicitly stated more business data about Cumquat Café.
Second, the argument claims that other businesses are unsuccessful at the old business location of Cumquat Café, since the former location has occupied three different businesses in the last years. This again is a very weak and unsupported claim, as the argument does not show any correlation between the Cumquat Café and the other businesses. To illustrate, it is well known that a Café has a totally different customer base than a pet-grooming shop. Therefore, it is wrong to assume that the other businesses do similar how Cumquat Café did in the location. The Café might have been the only Café in the area, whereas the other businesses could suffer from heavy competition. If the argument had provided more information and evidence for a correlation between the Cumquat Café and the other businesses than the argument would have been a lot more convincing.
Finally, the argument concludes that a high tenant change in the old location of Cumquat Cafe implies that the businesses are unsuccessful in that location. This statement again reveals poor reasoning as not only it is not clear whether Cumquat Café is actually successful in its new location, but also it is unsure whether the location is responsible. For example, the reason for the high tenant frequency could result from short-term lease contracts. Without convincing answers to these questions, one is left with the impression that the claim is more of a wishful thinking rather than substantive evidence.
In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above-mentioned reasons and is therefore unconvincing. It could be considerably be strengthened if more business data is provided by the author. Without this information, the argument remains unsubstantiated and open to debate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-09 | Aaishani De | 83 | view |
| 2022-10-16 | Chaitanya02 | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-06 | asm01 | 66 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | togunde25 | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | VC3O | 58 | view |
- This past winter 200 students from Waymarsh State College traveled to the state capitol building to protest againstproposed cuts in funding for various state college programs The other 12 000 Waymarsh students evidently weren tso concerned about their 68
- The following appeared as part of an article in the business section of a local newspaper The owners of the Cumquat Caf evidently made a good business decision in moving to a new location as can
- The producers of the forthcoming movie 3003 will be most likely to maximize their profits if they are willing to pay Robin Good several million dollars to star in it even though that amount is far more than any other person involved with the movie will ma 79
- Our research indicates that over the past six years no incidents of employee theft have been reported within 10 of the companies that have been our clients In analyzing the security practices of these 10 companies we have further learned that each of 70
- The Cumquat Cafe began advertising on our local radio station this year and was delighted to see its business increase by 10 percent over last year s totals Their success shows you how you can use radio advertising to make your business more profitabl 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, hence, if, second, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 55.5748502994 94% => OK
Nominalization: 42.0 16.3942115768 256% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2779.0 2260.96107784 123% => OK
No of words: 538.0 441.139720559 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16542750929 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.56307096286 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84853044623 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 204.123752495 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.408921933086 0.468620217663 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 864.9 705.55239521 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 18.0 8.76447105788 205% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 19.7664670659 137% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8435555181 57.8364921388 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.925925926 119.503703932 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9259259259 23.324526521 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85185185185 5.70786347227 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 6.88822355289 232% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.035879147722 0.218282227539 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0146221452764 0.0743258471296 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517074112134 0.0701772020484 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.026383230723 0.128457276422 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333194683414 0.0628817314937 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.5979740519 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.32208582834 92% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 98.500998004 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.