If people want to contribute to the society, which of the following is the best way?
1. riding bicycle or walking on foot
2. recycling the waste
3. buy local organic food
With the increasingly rapid development of modern society, mounting people begin to concern about various approaches that enables them to make contribution to society. Regarding this hot-debated topic, many individuals suggest that walking on foot or riding bikes is the best and easiest way. Personally, I totally support this idea for the following reasons.
First and foremost, low-carbon ways of commute like walking and riding can enormously benefit our environment, which is of great importance to the society above all. To state it more clearly, environmental problem is one of the most serious issues the society as a whole is confronting. If there are more people who choose to ride or walk to their company or school instead of driving their cars, the less carbon dioxide will be released into the air. What’s more, the noise made by viechles vehicles will decrease as well, making the society a better place where the sky is blue and people can quietly breath fresh air wherever they go, not having to wearing masks any longer. What a beautiful society it will be provided we all walk or ride bike as possible as we can!
Another point worth mentioning is that walk more and ride more is conducive to citizens’ mental health, which in the end will change our society into a healthier, happier one. As is known to all, the more advanced the society is, less time people actually have to do physical exercise or enjoy themselves by walking for hours to let some steam out. However, when more people start spend time on such behaviors, the happiness of the society will improve. For instance, my provincial government encourages citizens commute on foot as well as riding bicycles by giving out relevant identification. Many friends of mine have already got one since they achieve 50-hour-walk/ ride, which made them healthier and facilitated them to continue doing this. Thus, our citizens, like my friends, have become much healthier and feel happier than before, which in turn bring good to our society.
Admittedly, other methods such as reusing the waste and purchasing local organic food are also perfect choices when it comes to contributing to the society. Nevertheless, concerning which way can bring more long-lasting influence to society, these ideas become faint compared with waking and riding more. To put it into a nut shell, embracing your bike and using your foot is our priority, considering the environment problems as well as the happiness of the society’s body: ourselves.
- Some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship,because being away from people reminds us of how important they are. Others thinkwe should always stay with others to have good relations 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays parents can learn more from their children than their children can learn from their parents 76
- What is the most useful action for an individual to take for the protection of the natural environment 1 Leave vehicles at home and walk or ride a bike 2 Reuse and recycle waste 3 Purchase organic food in local markets Use specific reasons and examples to 90
- Parents should allow children to make their own choices rather than determine their children s future for them 70
- Some people like to buy and eat their meals at restaurants frequently, while others liketo do this at home. Which do you prefer? Why? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, well, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07971014493 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70352015233 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601449275362 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.0278448333 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.4375 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.875 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289382285107 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869687078823 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467977028619 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167340724597 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0105280118963 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.