TPO 53 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
It is imperative for governments to take care of their citizens so that they can have a safe and better lives which is very vital in this competative world. To make individuals' lives at ease, government is fully responsible to work on something which can benefit citizens. In my humble view, I totally disagree with the statement that governments should spend more money to improve internet access rather than to improve public transportation. I feel this way for certain reasons, which i will explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, many individuals commute on their own to go to their work. There are so many people who take buses and trains from home to work in order to save money. My own example is a compelling one. Three years ago, i moved to Chicago after graduating from university. Transit system in Chicago is amazing since many people ride on to go from work to home every single day. I knew i would not have to pay for gas or for car's maintainance. It has saved me huge amount of money and because of that, i have my own apartment. If i had not exploit public transit, i would not have saved up that much money for myself. Thanks to the government who has taken initiative and spend money to make best public transportation for people.
Second, public transportation is for all ages. Youngsters below 17 years of age, who go to school and who work in summer vacations are not allowed to drive in the US. Therefore, they are fully relied on these transportation. For instance, my brother, John is 16 years old. Our parents go to work at 6 in the morning. Thus, there's nobody who could drop him to school. Consequently, he decided to go to school from train. Sometimes he would not even get a place to sit and he would stand for an hour. Usually public transportation are full in the morning. Government should set up and take responsibility to add more buses and trains so that people can have more seats to sit.
To sum up, government has full authority to spend money and work on public transportation. This is because people can save money by travelling on public transportation and can ride safely and peacefully.
- TPO 44 European silver coin 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Smartphones have caused more harm than good to our society 70
- Types of air purifiers 81
- TPO 42 solutions to prevent injuries to birds 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to work as a team than as an individual to succeed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 488, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...eel this way for certain reasons, which i will explore in the subsequent paragrap...
^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...e is a compelling one. Three years ago, i moved to Chicago after graduating from ...
^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...m work to home every single day. I knew i would not have to pay for gas or for ca...
^
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...se of that, i have my own apartment. If i had not exploit public transit, i would...
^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'exploited'.
Suggestion: exploited
..., i have my own apartment. If i had not exploit public transit, i would not have saved ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...t. If i had not exploit public transit, i would not have saved up that much money...
^
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'make the best'.
Suggestion: make the best
...has taken initiative and spend money to make best public transportation for people. Se...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this transportation' or 'these transportations'?
Suggestion: this transportation; these transportations
...US. Therefore, they are fully relied on these transportation. For instance, my brother, John is 16 y...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...s go to work at 6 in the morning. Thus, theres nobody who could drop him to school. Co...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for instance, i feel, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6335078534 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80310146322 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502617801047 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4952170598 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.8 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.28 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.96 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244769033536 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669170829358 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102616611163 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161806677464 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713551894174 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 11.7677419355 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.98 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.