“Facebook is neither good or bad. It depends on how use it.” What do you think about the statement? In about 150 words, write a paragraph to express your opinion.
“Facebook is neither good or bad. It depends on how use it.” This statement I extremely agree. Anything has two sides, advantages and disadvantages, so Facebook also has them.
The first, the disavantages of Facebook. Facebook is really a big social network, it covers up all around the world, so that, the informations that users can give are also so multiform. It has not only the good informations, but also the toxic ones. The users are being exposed this bad informations can make the serious proplems, such as: murders, criminals, …. In addition, using Facebook a lot is also harmful for your health, exspecially, your back and your eyes. Besides, you can contact with not good people on Facebook, it affects your life not well.
The second, the advantages of Facebook. As you know, the users can give a lot of informations from Facebook. Therefore, it has much many the good informations beside the bad ones. Facebook helps you contact with your friends, you can have better life, such as chatting with your friends instead of calling. You aslo can get the advertisement for your job, or about some course you can sign up to have better skills. Moreover, it has a lot of the creators make the contents which are good for yourself, such as: health, doing excersise, beauty, studying,…. And they are all free! That’s great! So that, Facebook has a lot of advantages.
The finally, Facebook is neither good nor bad, its absolutely depends on how use it. You want it’s good, it’s good. But you want it’s bad, it’s bad. In my opinion, no one wants it’s bad, doesn’t it? Therefore, you must have plan to discipline yourself. Let’s follow the good informations, the good influencers. You must recognize the informations which you see is good or bad, and then, you can choose to read or not. Exspecially, you should use Facebook less, don’t expends on it too much.
And the last, the person you want to become, it also depends on your action now. So that, let’s do the positive things to have better life and become the best of “you”.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-24 | nhatphuong_ | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 27, Rule ID: NEITHER_NOR[1]
Message: Use 'nor' with neither.
Suggestion: nor
“Facebook is neither good or bad. It depends on how use it.” This st...
^^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Moreover, it has a lot of the creators make the contents which are good for you...
^^
Line 5, column 554, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...ealth, doing excersise, beauty, studying,…. And they are all free! That’s great! S...
^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ally, Facebook is neither good nor bad, its absolutely depends on how use it. You w...
^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: IT_IS[22]
Message: Did you mean 'its' (possessive pronoun) instead of 'it's' (short form of 'it is')?
Suggestion: its
..., it’s bad. In my opinion, no one wants it’s bad, doesn’t it? Therefore, you must ha...
^^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'planned'.
Suggestion: planned
...d, doesn’t it? Therefore, you must have plan to discipline yourself. Let’s follow th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, if, moreover, really, second, so, then, therefore, well, in addition, such as, you know, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 4.92783505155 223% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 5.05154639175 257% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 53.0 32.9175257732 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 26.3917525773 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 937.175257732 184% => OK
No of words: 356.0 206.0 173% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84269662921 4.54256449028 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 3.78020617076 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68611597628 2.54303337028 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 127.690721649 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494382022472 0.622605031667 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 499.5 290.88556701 172% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.13402061856 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 0.824742268041 1212% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.83505154639 218% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.463917525773 1293% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 12.6804123711 205% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 13.0 16.3608247423 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3748335058 44.8134815571 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 66.3076923077 76.5299724578 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6923076923 16.8248392259 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 4.34317383033 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 2.54639175258 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 7.41237113402 148% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 1.49484536082 602% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336164660118 0.216113520407 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106845565458 0.0766984524023 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678487572702 0.0603063233224 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201299321184 0.12726935374 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061592162516 0.0580467560999 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 8.37731958763 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 70.7449484536 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 7.45979381443 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.2 8.71597938144 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 7.59969072165 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 41.2886597938 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 8.62886597938 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 8.54432989691 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 8.15463917526 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.